Difference between revisions of "CyberShake 1D Model"
From SCECpedia
Jump to navigationJump to search| Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
[http://hypocenter.usc.edu/research/plots/1dcybershake/plot_CVM-H%2011.9.1%20with%20GTL_Rho_avg.pdf Rho average plot] | [http://hypocenter.usc.edu/research/plots/1dcybershake/plot_CVM-H%2011.9.1%20with%20GTL_Rho_avg.pdf Rho average plot] | ||
| − | [[ | + | [[file:plot_CVM-S_Vs_avg.png|left|150px|CVM-S4]] |
| − | [[ | + | [[file:plot_CVM-S4.26_Vs_avg.png|center|150px|CVM-S4.26]] |
| − | [[ | + | [[file:plot_CVM-H 11.9.1 with GTL_Vs_avg.png|right|150px|CVM-H]] |
Revision as of 16:28, 24 January 2014
1D Model Selection for CyberShake
Currently, there are multiple alternative 1D models being evaluated for the next CyberShake run.
Below are plots averaging each CVM (CVM-S4, CVM-S4.26, and CVM-H 11.9.1 with GTL) over the 286 stations included within the last CyberShake 13.4 study.
CVM-S
Vp average plot
Vs average plot
Rho average plot
CVM-S4.26
Vp average plot
Vs average plot
Rho average plot
CVM-H 11.9.1 with GTL
Vp average plot
Vs average plot
Rho average plot
