Difference between revisions of "Chino Hills 1D and 3D"
From SCECpedia
Jump to navigationJump to search| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
== Chino Hills Source Description in SRC Format == | == Chino Hills Source Description in SRC Format == | ||
| + | |||
| + | FAULT_WIDTH = 4.60 | ||
| + | HYPO_ALONG_STK = 0.0 | ||
| + | DLEN = 0.1 | ||
| + | HYPO_DOWN_DIP = 2.30 | ||
| + | DWID = 0.1 | ||
| + | RAKE = 146 | ||
| + | FAULT_LENGTH = 6.30 | ||
| + | DEPTH_TO_TOP = 12.79 | ||
| + | MAGNITUDE = 5.39 | ||
| + | LAT_TOP_CENTER = 33.939 | ||
| + | STRIKE = 296 | ||
| + | LON_TOP_CENTER = -117.771 | ||
| + | DIP = 66 | ||
| + | SEED = 4745706 | ||
== Chino Hills Station List == | == Chino Hills Station List == | ||
Revision as of 20:22, 14 July 2014
SCEC researchers are comparing the differences between Chino Hills simulations using 1D methods, based on the Broadband Platform, and 3D methods, based on Hercules-GPU software.
Contents
BBP Chino Hills Evaluation Methods
SCEC BBP researchers use the Chino Hills earthquake as a validation event. They have defined a 1D velocity model for the region, selected a consensus fault geometry and earthquake magnitude, and selected a set of ground motion observations for use in comparisons to synthetics.
BBP Velocity Model for Chino Hills
Chino Hills Source Description in SRC Format
FAULT_WIDTH = 4.60 HYPO_ALONG_STK = 0.0 DLEN = 0.1 HYPO_DOWN_DIP = 2.30 DWID = 0.1 RAKE = 146 FAULT_LENGTH = 6.30 DEPTH_TO_TOP = 12.79 MAGNITUDE = 5.39 LAT_TOP_CENTER = 33.939 STRIKE = 296 LON_TOP_CENTER = -117.771 DIP = 66 SEED = 4745706
