CVM Evaluation

From SCECpedia
Revision as of 00:01, 24 February 2011 by Maechlin (talk | contribs) (Created page with 'SCEC's CVM evaluation system is designed to show differences between currently available California CVM's. Our CVM evaluations use wave propagation simulations of moderate magnit…')
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigationJump to search

SCEC's CVM evaluation system is designed to show differences between currently available California CVM's. Our CVM evaluations use wave propagation simulations of moderate magnitude historical earthquakes.

When a CVM is registered with the CVM evaluation system, three things happen:

  1. A software distribution of the CVM is posted online so that it is accessible to the SCEC Community
  2. The CVM is used so construct a velocity mesh for a 1Hz Chino Hills simulation. In the future, additional validation events may be used.
  3. The system runs a 1Hz wave propagation simulation and compares simulation results to observed seismograms for the event
  4. Evaluation results, including velocity profile plots, and waveform-based goodness of fit measures are posted for all registered CVM's.

Recent CVM Evaluations

CVM evaluations are typically run when new CVM's are released. In Feb, 2011, we released CVM-H v11.2. At this time, we ran CVM evaluations for three different SCEC CVM's including:

  1. CVM-H
  2. CVM-Hcapi
  3. CVM-S

Evaluation results for CVM-H v11.2 and other SCEC CVM's are posted here:

Example Goodness of Fit Measures

Our CVM Evaluation system uses several goodness of fit measures. As one example, here are frequency dependent, amplitude-based, bias plots used in the CVM evaluation process.

Fig 1: Chino Hills 1Hz GOF with CVM-4.
Fig 2: Chino Hills 1Hz GOF with CVM-6.2
Fig 3: Chino Hills 1Hz GOF with CVM6.2+GTL